“To whom it may concern,

My name is Mariya B., … I study International Relations in the third semester in Hochschule Rhein-Waal in Kleve. This is a university of Applied Science, and we have to deal with issues, concerning the real life. In order to complete the requirements for this semester, I have to write a scientific paper for a crisis nowadays. From the available topics, I have chosen the “Ebola crisis in Africa”, and for the research question I am thinking to write about “Could Ebola-Virus be seen as a biological weapon”. Along with the research process, I also need to handle an interview, with an “expert”, who is dealing with the issues, I am concerned, and I find your Ebola Report really interesting and somehow challenging the mass opinion of the western world. Therefore, I would be very thankful, if You answer this email and spend some time, answering questions and helping me to get an objective view about this topic.

Thank You in advance.

Sincerely,

Mariya B.”

---

My first question is why conspiracy theories exist? And how far are they discussed in normal media? (And by “normal” I’m referring to popular newspapers and sites, like the one you’ve published your article, because many of the conspiracy theories I’ve found were on Facebook, twitter or some tiny blogs).

There exist two distinct kinds of so called conspiracy theories. On one hand we have people who find themselves in a world/reality where facts and indications don’t match official narratives. This prompts those people to either come up with their own theory about something or to subscribe to a theory they perceive to be more logical or accurate, according to the accompanying evidence that exists or the lack thereof. In a next phase this theory is then being distributed and shared with fellow earthlings who are unsuspecting, in an attempt to make them aware of the theory and that an official narrative is false.

On the other hand we have people who put trust in pure fabrications and fantasy stories hatched by:

• Themselves
• Totally misdirected folks who come up with a theory about something based on wrong information and even right out lies
• ‘Disinfo agents’ who are in many instances paid operatives – by corporate, religious, sectarian, military and/or government shill tanks – to derail any credible opposition (alternative/free media, real grassroots rebellion, militia)

However, conspiracy theories are not the same as conspiracy facts and conspiracy realities. There where the theories remain suggestive and in many cases even fail to bring forward hard evidence or even indications for the made claims, the facts and realities speak for themselves. They are only not being called official narratives by the establishment media and governments since these realities would destroy the enforced public opinion and the reputation of media outlets and governments.

Yet, no matter how well a conspiracy reality is explained and how detailed the evidence and indications are many people will deny its value and thus choose to intensely protect their fantasy bubble that was created, and is constantly updated, by those who are guilty in the concerning conspiracy reality and by those who have interests in upholding the false narratives that whitewash the said conspiracy reality.

Conspiracy theories are hardly discussed in or by “normal” media, when they are they are almost always ridiculed (tin foil hat). It’s not that there aren’t any good reporters or news anchors in the ‘normal’ (mainstream, establishment) press it’s just that they are not allowed to break any sealed cases that could actually educate a population or a part thereof.

Conspiracy theories that do get published in the ‘normal’ press or broadcasted by ‘normal’ media will often, if not always, result in sanctions for an outlet, the author, the producer, the product. As you well know, people have been murdered many times in the past for breaking a story on a proven conspiracy.

Why people are so ignorant of Africa and the issues that the population of the continent faces?

For too many decades the western audience has been fed all sorts of “the poor Africans can’t help themselves” campaigns, to cultivate a needed normalcy bias, launched by corrupt governments and corporative (for profit) “non profit” NGOs who at the very top, and almost always led by the United Nations in some way, divert huge parts of the help that ordinary folks and truly honest organizations send and offer. This results in situations where nothing ever changes, deliberately that is.

On top of that, the common people who read the “normal” newspapers and watch “normal” broadcasts are not given a full picture of what actually has been going on on the African continent.

The purpose of the fabricated narratives that the general population gets is to maintain a far-away-from-here setting where only foreign armies and almighty UN-linked organizations and agencies are believed to be able to make things better, when in reality they literally rape the continent and its women aside from trafficking its children and natural resources.

This has been going on for decades and by now it is engrained in the education and belief systems of the general, mainstream, society in the west and as a whole.

God forbid that ordinary people would find out that during all these decades and until this very day their national army, their government and the United Nations have instead been looting Africa; have been robbing the continent from its resources; have violently been erasing entire communities; have knowingly and willingly been stalling any meaningful economic, social, education and healthcare developments in Africa. Once common people would actually be aware of this en mass their would be little purpose left, if at all anyway, for for instance the UN to even exist. Educating the ordinary people about what the UN and its slave nations actually do in Africa, and all around the world, is likely the most powerful way and best option at hand to try to turn the tide.

The fault is largely the media’s and the governments’ but people should on their own also be more actively involved in digging for facts instead of just blindly consuming what CNN and the BBC present.

In your opinion which conspiracy theory is the most plausible one? And can it really be used to explain in depth the situation in West Africa?

The most plausible explanation for the fraudulent 2014 ebola campaign is, from my point of view, the Truth Sector Ebola Report, thus including all updates thereof and the third party information and works that it links to.

What has been unfolding in West Africa is not a small thing. Many people and organizations are involved, it requires a central command that very well knows what it is aiming at.

In addition there are also those who see opportunities in (fake) crises to sell their stuff or to tap into (public) funds that are just sitting there, thus adding to the confusion and making the fraudulent campaign appear more valid, more authentic, more real.

I believe that, yes, the Truth Sector Ebola Report can indeed explain in depth the situation in West Africa because it provides information on different levels, from different angles and puts all the cards on the table.

If the Red Cross is really responsible for the Ebola outbreak, how can you explain the fact that Nigeria is Ebola-free since 31st of August and Liberia is not, although they managed to drive the organization out of their borders?

The Red Cross, as the UN’s major lapdog, is responsible for distributing tainted vaccines and for aiding in the rolling out of the “humanitarian” campaign of the UN. In that way they are more than responsible for the alleged ebola outbreak, which due to the lack of ebola evidence can’t in fact be called an ebola outbreak at all.

All indications point at experiments with vaccines and tapping into unused public funds, aside from further invading the African continent by the western powers in a non violent way. This clearly sells well to the western audience and the goals and targets have been successfully reached. Africa is now even more invaded nice and tightly through the UNMEER, which makes it even binding. I mean, can you imagine that? It is a binding UN resolution to further bankrupt the Africans and loot their continent under the pretext of “ebola.” Legalized brigandage, the climax of modern civilization.

However, it is through unsuspecting and actual good people that rulers of darkness execute their plans, thus, common people – the volunteers – who work for the Red Cross for example are not necessarily to be blamed for the lies and the frauds they unknowingly help to spread. After all, they themselves are likely unaware of what is actually in the vaccines and that the ones on top are merely running a game of shadows.

In your opinion why African people are in opposition to modern health organizations? And how far do they go against their religion and traditions? What is the impact of the theories in regard to opposing the modern health system?

Due to the long history of “white foreigners” invading Africa and killing tribes and entire communities and due to the fact that in at least the two previous centuries a minority of foreign doctors have illegally been experimenting on Africans and have been harvesting their organs, it is to be expected that the local people oppose the white man’s needles and cures.

The differences between western and African cultural rituals certainly contribute to a strong opposition for modern health organizations but the enforced underdevelopment including likewise deliberate low grade education and information access are, as far as I am concerned, far more the reason why Africans oppose the coming and interference of the west on African turf.

Enforcing underdevelopment and to limit education in Africa is what is to be expected from foreign invaders such as the UN, the EU, the US, their agencies and their corporations.

Do you believe that Ebola could be classified as a fake pandemic, meaning that the death in Africa is real, but the explanation is false?

Fake: Yes. Deaths real: No.

The ebola outbreak is fake because there is no ebola outbreak at all, even the BBC has more than once admitted that there weren’t even ebola cases in the very epicenter of the alleged outbreak. Since then the epicenter had been relocated (!!!???), I mean this is too absurd for words and proves by itself that it is a fake pandemic.

Like every year there of course may have been certain cases of real ebola but that was quickly under control, as admitted by aid agencies who were going home. What happened next though, well that’s the scam that the Truth Sector Ebola Report lays out in the open, for everyone to witness.

In addition, concerning the alleged ebola death toll, up to 83% of the bodies that have been buried came/come without an official cause of death, meaning that those people could have died naturally or from any other illness or infection, if not murdered. This however can likely never be proven since the evidence has been buried and is decomposing as we speak.

But then again, even the alleged number of ebola deaths is not accurate too since the entire game of numbers is rigged at the very top, the UN. They have partially admitted to this by recently lowering the estimated death toll because people are on to their fraud and falsifications.

Is there a real connection between the overpopulation of Africa and the outbreak of the virus? And if yes, why only West Africa is affected? Can you comment on the statement that 75% of the victims of Ebola are women, which will reduce the reproduction ability of the west part of the continent?

Africa is not overpopulated, nor is the rest of the world. It is true of course that population is concentrated in cities and in slums this often leads to low hygiene standards due to the poverty that rules the lives of the concerning inhabitants. Any disease is in slums thus more easily spread.

The low hygiene standards that millions of Africans face, and for that matter many other millions of people in other developing parts of the world including here in the Philippines, ties in to the deliberate stalling of the overall development of the “third world” by design at the hands of the western nations their governments and elitists. This is by the way all and very well documented and easy to verify by anyone who has access to an online search engine.

As for the 75% of the alleged ebola victims being female: It was claimed by so called experts that that was to be expected anyway because women are the most exposed to other people due to the nature of their professional occupation, as many work on public markets. However, this expertly brought explanation was completely destroyed by a following report also from experts saying that suddenly 75% of the alleged ebola victims were now male.

Therefore, yes, I am inclined to put more trust in the assumption that indeed more women were targeted specifically, to as you put it “reduce the reproduction ability.”

In any event, once the word got out that their experts’ initial comments on the 75% issue had been entirely trashed they obviously switched to the alternate explanation to save their face and to make those who had exposed the intentions look like crazy conspiracy theorists.

Still, I have found many persons in private and even one publicly on Facebook who by no means are anywhere near nutcase conspiracy theorists who all saw what was right before our eyes.

In your opinion why the US government patent the Ebola virus in 2009? Is it only because of the profit for the pharmaceutical companies?

The US patenting ebola is indeed intriguing but allegations of it being part of dark plans to inoculate the world with laced garbage is officially explained away very easily since it had been announced that the measure was taken to facilitate cheap access to the virus, without passing by big pharma’s cashiers.

Of course one should know better and I urge anyone to take a closer look at Project BioShield, the linked funds and those who benefit from the whole charade. Answers are there to find when one actually pays attention.

How can you comment the statement of Dr Peter Walsh: “the risk is that a terrorist group may seek to obtain the virus out in West Africa”? Do you believe that this really can happen?

Yes, the US government operatives and their UNEI allies have indeed obtained this virus along with many others decades ago, which they use eagerly in their eugenics experiments.

Dr. Peter Walsh his statement is thus nothing but useful idiots propaganda for and by the creators and financiers of a by a Skynet-like control-grid-monitored prison planet, here on Earth.